Index 2022
149/180
Score : 41.25
Political indicator
154
38.38
Economic indicator
161
27.55
Legislative indicator
133
52.92
Social indicator
134
55.00
Security indicator
149
32.37
Index 2021
153/180
Score : 50.21
N/A
Indicators not available because the calculation method was changed in 2022

Authoritarianism is gaining ground in Turkey, challenging media pluralism. All possible means are used to undermine critics.

Media landscape

With 90% of the national media now under government control, the public has turned, during the past five years, to critical or independent media outlets of various political persuasions to learn about the impact of the economic and political crisis on the country. They include local TV channels such as Fox TV, Halk TV, Tele1 and Sözcü, and international news websites such as BBC Turkish, VOA Turkish and Deutsche Welle Turkish.

Political context

As the 2023 election approaches, the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan “hyper-presidency” has stepped up its attacks on journalists in a bid to deflect attention from the country's economic and democratic decline and to shore up its political base. However, tactics such as near systematic censorship on the internet, frivolous lawsuits against critical media outlets or the misuse of the judicial system have, until now, enabled Erdoğan to restore his popularity rating,  while he continues to be embroiled in a major case of corruption and political clientelism.

Legal framework

Discriminatory practices against critical journalists and media outlets, such as stripping them of press passes, are commonplace. Judges who do the government’s bidding are trying to limit democratic debate by censoring online articles tackling corruption and similarly sensitive topics. This makes it hard to publish quality reporting. Some journalists have nonetheless tried to remain faithful to their mission to report the news with complete independence, and they are demanding recognition of a “media ombudsman”.

Economic context

The government and private sector companies allied with the government endanger media pluralism by channelling ads and subsidies to media outlets that give them favourable coverage. The Press Advertising Council (BIK) uses the allocation of state advertising to put financial pressure on recalcitrant dailies, while the High Council for Broadcasting (RTÜK) helps to weaken critical TV channels economically by giving them heavy fines. Some dailies have had to reduce their number of pages because of the price of paper.

Sociocultural context

Journalists who criticise or question well-known religious figures are sometimes the targets of lawsuits accusing them of “insult”. References to domestic violence or various forms of abuse, especially when made by women journalists, can give rise to social media hate campaigns.

Safety

The spiral of violence targeting journalists critical of the ruling AKP-MHP alliance has intensified since the 2019 local elections. As the 2023 elections approach, ultra-nationalist groups, spurred on by anti-media political rhetoric, are taking to the streets to attack reporters, columnists, commentators and citizen-journalists who cover politics and discuss the economic crisis.