Index 2022
53/180
Score : 68.79
Political indicator
50
68.12
Economic indicator
54
50.41
Legislative indicator
71
69.12
Social indicator
91
68.80
Security indicator
22
87.48
Index 2021
39/180
Score : 76.68
N/A
Indicators not available because the calculation method was changed in 2022

In this small country, information pluralism and high-quality journalism are jeopardised by the small size of the market and virtually unceasing pressure from the  politically and economically powerful. Private media are controlled by bankers and business people with strong, vested interests.+

Media landscape

Andorra’s tiny size and concentration of economic power limit the number of outlets and their independence. State-owned RTVA, which operates largely under government influence, co-exists with daily newspapers, led by Diari d’Andorra. Of the remaining publications, some are controlled by bankers with strong vested interests. The principality’s only “news agency” functions as more of a communications agency.

Political context

The principality’s relatively young democratic tradition and the influence of economic elites in all institutions favour a degree of opacity in government-media relations. As a result, journalists have a hard time fulfilling their role in forcing government accountability.

Legal framework

Official censorship does not exist. But journalists are pushed into self-censorship by the close relations between state-owned media and government, and by the influence of economic and financial elites in privately owned media. Journalists are limited to chronicling daily life rather than revealing financial scandals.

Economic context

Banking sector influence is omnipresent. It determines advertising purchases and, in the absence of mechanisms to protect editorial independence, the editorial lines of press outlets.

Sociocultural context

Media independence is threatened by a degree of hostility to the pluralism of ideas in a society strongly influenced by the Catholic Church. In addition, an archaic legal system makes journalists’ access to reliable sources a practical impossibility. These would include interviews with judges.