Authorities seek to suppress news of plight of held journalists
Organisation:
Reporters Without Borders today expresses its deep concern in respect of the conditions in which
journalists and political opponents have been held since the demonstrations of 19 December
2010.
“The pressures exerted on them and their defence teams, and the efforts to limit dissemination of
news about them, recall the repression campaigns of the Soviet era,” the organization says today.
Visits by lawyers to their clients are strictly limited under the pretext that the detention centre
only has one room set aside for this purpose. The lawyer for Natalia Radzina, editor in chief
of Charter 97, was able to see her on 19 January 2011. He found her unwell, suffering from
bronchitis and influenza. Irina Khalip, journalist with Novaya Gazeta and wife of opposition
candidate Andrei Sanikov, has not seen a lawyer since 30 December.
The couple (at present in prison and facing jail terms of five to 15 years) have been subject to
psychological pressures, with the Belarusian authorities saying that the mother of Irina Khalip
needed to be declared suitable if she was to take care of the couple’s three year old son.
Otherwise he would be placed in an orphanage. After 10 days the grandmother was finally able to
take over his care. The couple have also been accused by the official journal of having fomented
a coup d’état, backed by Poland and Germany
In another development on 20 January the Minsk Bar Association (MCBA) advised its members
only to reply to written questions from journalists and to require them to submit their articles
before publication.
“The MCBA has published this recommendation under pressure from the justice ministry which
is trying to limit as much as possible access to news about the political opposition and journalists
facing prosecution for taking part in an illegal demonstration,” said Andrei Bastunets, lawyer
for the Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ), a partner organization of Reporters Without
Borders.
“This recommendation is not a legal act and should not have legal consequences.”
If the advice is followed, journalists will no longer be able to conduct interviews by telephone.
This directive will help isolate the detainees and prevent them being defended at the national or
international level.
Pressure continues to be exercised on media professionals. On 18 January, Barys Haretski,
correspondent of the Polish radio station Racyja, was given a 14-day jail sentence. He had been
arrested on 17 January by a KGB officer while interviewing contacts of opposition activists on
the grounds that he did not have accreditation. He was charged with having taken part in the
demonstration of 19 December. But on that day he was covering the demonstration for Radio
Racyja.
He is one of about 30 journalists arrested for taking part in the demonstration, although they were
simply carrying out their duties. The KGB officers also searched the apartment of his mother
and brother. Movsun Gaszhiyev, the correspondent of the Russian daily Kommersant, has also
been the victim of this kind of pressure. He was told by the foreign ministry that his accreditation
( which he has had since 2008) will not in the end be extended because of “inexactitudes” in his
documents.
Also on 17 January Yohen Vaskovitch, a young journalist from Bobruisky Kuryer was arrested
and sentenced, for the second time, to 10 days in prison for “vandalism”. His editors say that
on 16 December, the day he is supposed to have committed the offence, he was on a job
observing the electoral process in several polling stations. He had already been given a 12 day
sentence on 19 December and had refused to sign an undertaking that he would not take part in
a demonstration. His apartment was also searched and his computer seized.
On 20 January the heads of the official station ONT told journalist Siarhey Darafeyeu that he
would soon be banned from presenting the discussion programme Vybar. The decision came a
month after the special edition “Election Day” during which he had openly questioned the legality
of the presidential vote. He succeeded in making the official from the electoral commission
recognize that the electoral process had been blemished by violations of the law. He also asked
officials to explain why voters were not allowed to organize demonstrations and why opposition
members had not been able to act as observers.
Darafeyeu says he did not break the law and does not understand why he can no longer present
the programme.
“All the programmes I have presented are in full agreement with Belarusian law and journalistic
norms,” he told Reporters Without Borders.
Finally in recent days at least six BAJ members have been questioned by KGB officers about the
19 December demonstrations.
While President Alexander Lukashenko (who was officially sworn in on 21 January) strives
to defend the legitimacy of his re-election, the European and US authorities have announced
sanctions against his regime.
On 20 January the European Parliament condemned the repression conducted by the Belarusian
government and called for the organization of new free and democratic elections. The committee
of ministers of the Council of Europe is due to take a decision on 31 January on the restriction
of visas for Belarusian officials and on a freeze on the financial aid given by the International
Monetary Fund. A group of US senators has called on the European authorities to undertake joint
measures with the United States, entailing real consequences, to stem the repression.
Published on
Updated on
20.01.2016