RSF condemns court ruling ordering Vice News journalist to hand over messaging with ISIS fighter
On Thursday Reporters Without Borders (RSF) signed a joint letter with Canadian media and press freedom organizations condemning the Ontario Superior Court ruling ordering Vice News reporter Ben Makuch to hand over all communications between him and an ISIS fighter to the Royal Canadian Mountain Police (RCMP). The ruling sets a dangerous precedent for the independence of journalists and the protection of their sources.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ), Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE), the Canadian Media Guild, CWA/SCA Canada and the Fédération Professionnelle des Journalistes du Québec (FPJQ) have issued a joint letter to Canadian Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale expressing alarm over the Ontario Superior Court ruling that Vice News reporter Ben Makuch must hand over all communications between him and an ISIS fighter to the Royal Candian Mountain Police (RCMP). The coaltion of organizations urges Canadian authorities to respect the independence of journalists and their need to protect their sources.
“The protection of sources is a foundational principle of journalism, making crucial reporting like Makuch’s coverage of ISIS possible in the first place,” the letter states. “By forcing Makuch to hand over his notes to the RCMP, or go to jail, Justice Ian MacDonnell has undermined press freedom—a critical component of our democratic society—and set a precedent that could lead to an increase in RCMP requests for notes and communications, making it less likely that sources will be willing to speak with journalists. Thus, a crucial window into understanding the world will be closed, and the public’s right to know will be critically diminished.”
“As one of the world's strongest democracies, Canada should set a positive example of protecting journalists' sources, not the other way around,” said Delphine Halgand, US Director of Reporters Without Borders (RSF). “Where is press freedom headed in Canada if the police can easily obtain notes and recordings from journalists?”
“This represents a terrible blow for press freedom in Canada. Journalists are not a law enforcement arm for the government and to be treated as such by the judiciary is a significant threat to their independence” said Tom Henheffer, Executive Director of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE). “If police increasingly take journalists’ notes and communications, sources will be less willing to talk, and stories like Makuch’s won’t be told in the first place.”
“We journalists work to inform people on matters of public interest; namely, in this case, the process through which Canadians become indoctrinated and join jihadist groups,” said Lise Millette, President of the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec (FPJQ). “This Court decision sets us on a slippery slope where we won't be able to talk to alleged criminals because our communications could be used in police investigations. If sources become too afraid to talk to journalists, we will be limited in our capacity to uncover the truth, and the public will be left in the dark.”
“Journalists should never be expected to act as an on-call branch of law enforcement. We report in the public interest, not in the interest of ongoing police investigations,” said Nick Taylor-Vaisey, President of the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ). “Sources who share sensitive documents with journalists must have confidence that those journalists can protect that information. The recent ruling in Ontario could set a dangerous precedent, and certainly threatens press freedom.”
“This would mean a reporter could go to jail just for doing the job Canadians expect them to do. It’s outrageous in a country that prides itself on freedom of expression and a free press," said Carmel Smyth, President of Canadian Media Guild.
The letter can be read here.