Court upholds government's claim to be able to block opposition websites

Reporters Without Borders today condemned a ruling by an administrative court attached to Egypt's council of state upholding an information and communication ministry decision two weeks ago that the authorities can block, suspend or shut down any website liable to pose a threat to national security. The judge who issued the ruling, Farouq Abdul-Qader, even urged parliament to pass a law to this effect as soon as possible. “Empowering government officials to shut down a website on their own initiative is unacceptable,” Reporters Without Borders said. “We hold that only a judge should be able take this kind of action. The council of state ruling could set a dangerous judicial precedent. This complicity between courts and government bodes ill for online free expression in Egypt and we would oppose any law endorsing the judge's decision.” The ruling was issued in response to a complaint by the journalist in charge of the Al-Methaq Al-Araby website accusing the information ministry of pressuring the company that hosts the site to close it down on the grounds that it jeopardised national security. No existing law says a government department may demand that an Internet company block, suspend or close down a website. Al-Methaq Al-Araby posted essays that were very critical of the government, especially corrupt officials. Judge Abdul-Qader ruled that the authorities should “do their duty” when they think national security is threatened. Meanwhile two bloggers, Mohamed Sharkawy and Karim El-Shaer, are currently detained in Egypt while a third one, Alaa Abd El-Fatah, the co-author of Manal and Alaa's Bit Bucket, was released on 22 June after being held for 45 days. ------------- Create your blog with Reporters without borders: www.rsfblog.org