Despite its reputation as the least repressive country in the Gulf, the emirate exercises a great deal of control over news and information, which increased at the end of the reign of Emir Sheikh Nawaf al-Ahmad al-Sabah and under the reign of his successor, Sheikh Mishal al-Ahmad al-Sabah, in 2023.
Media landscape
The media landscape is dominated by the traditional newspapers Al-Qabas, Al-Jarida and Al-Siyasa, which are not very critical of the government. Thanks to podcasts such as Bidun Waraq and independent digital magazines such as Manshoor, the media world has undergone a degree of democratisation but state-controlled information still holds sway.
Political context
The government exercises a significant degree of control over information, and freedom of expression remains limited, although many members of Kuwait's opposition in exile were recently pardoned. Some media outlets – such as Al-Watan TV in 2015 – have been closed for “anti-government” comments.
Legal framework
Since 2020, the law on the right to access information is supposed to safeguard the work of journalists in Kuwait. But in reality, the law is thwarted by censorship laws that prohibit journalists, bloggers and online activists from criticising the government, the emir, the ruling family, its allies or religion. The same is true for the cybercrime law that took effect in January 2016.
Economic context
Most Kuwaiti media companies are owned by families that are members of the wealthy elite. Creating a media outlet requires applying for a government licence – an expensive and tedious process. The biggest media outlets function as communication tools for the private sector, with large sums paid in exchange for an article.
Sociocultural context
Many subjects are taboo in Kuwait. It is particularly difficult for journalists to tackle migrant worker rights, women’s rights and corruption.
Safety
While Kuwait is not known for murdering or imprisoning its journalists, some have been forced to flee the country to avoid serving prison sentences. Interrogations and short-term detentions have a chilling effect on the freedom to inform.